Carl Haasper has a solid publication record (~150+ papers) with mid-30s h-index and >4k citations, and he’s repeatedly recognized by leading orthopaedic journals for high-quality peer review, indicating impact both as an author and as a reviewer. SciSpaceGoogle ScholarSpringerLinkLippincott Journals+1
1. Publication Overview
| Source | Total Documents | Indexed / Peer-Reviewed | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web of Science (Core Collection) | 141 | 121 | WoS-indexed peer-reviewed journal articles, majority in orthopaedics and trauma surgery |
| Google Scholar | ~159 | N/A | Broader coverage including conference papers, book chapters, and some non-indexed articles |
| SciSpace | ~159 | N/A | Similar coverage as Google Scholar |
| DNB (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) | 3+ major works | 2 key books / Habilitation | Includes Kniesprechstunde (2016) and Habilitation thesis on osteochondral transplant tissue engineering (2008) |
Observation: Carl Haasper has a solid body of work (~120–160 publications), focusing on orthopaedics, trauma surgery, and tissue engineering. His ORCID profile confirms authorship in orthopaedics (e.g., musculoskeletal infection/arthroplasty research). ORCID
2. Citation Metrics
| Metric | Web of Science | Google Scholar |
|---|---|---|
| Total citations | 2,021 | ~4,225 |
| Citations without self-citations | 1,951 | N/A |
| h-index | 27 | 35 |
| i10-index | N/A | 92 |
| Times cited by patents | 2 | N/A |
| Times cited by policy documents | 0 | N/A |
Interpretation:
- WoS provides a conservative, verified measure; Google Scholar captures a wider citation footprint.
- The h-index and citation counts indicate strong influence in orthopaedics and trauma research.
- Minimal patent/policy citations suggest academic focus rather than translational output.
3. Peer-Review & Editorial Contributions
| Metric | Publons / Web of Science |
|---|---|
| Verified peer reviews | 371 |
| Verified editor records | 14 |
| Awarded grants | 3 |
Insight: Carl Haasper is a highly active peer reviewer and editor, reflecting recognition for review quality and editorial expertise. Named among Top Reviewers by Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (CORR) for highest mean review-quality scores (Top 50, Sept 2016–Aug 2017). SpringerLink
Included again by CORR/LWW in annual “Thank You to Our Peer Reviewers” lists highlighting reviewers with the highest mean review-quality scores (2020, 2022). Lippincott Journals+
4. Key Works (from DNB)
Kniesprechstunde (BookRix, 2016) – Orthopaedics, practical guide for knee disorders.
Habilitation Thesis: Tissue-Engineering eines osteochondralen Transplantates (Med. Hochschule Hannover, 2008) – Experimental and clinical research on osteochondral transplantation.
Selected Journal Article: Long-term results after microfracture treatment for full-thickness knee chondral lesions in athletes (Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2014)
Antagonizing microRNA ‐19a/b augments PTH anabolic action and restores bone mass in osteoporosis (EMBO, 2022)
5. Author Impact Visuals
- Web of Science Beamplot: Median citation percentile above average; most publications rank well among peers (1980–2023).
- Peer-Review Recognition: Reflects broad influence in shaping the field beyond publications.
6. Overall Assessment by ChatGPT
- Research Output: Extensive, well-indexed, with consistent contributions to orthopaedic trauma and tissue engineering.
- Citation Impact: Strong, with h-index 27 (WoS) / 35 (Google Scholar) and ~2,000–4,200 citations.
- Peer-Review & Editorial Influence: Very high; 371 verified reviews, 14 editorial roles.
- Academic Recognition: Includes major monographs, Habilitation, and high-impact journal publications.
- External Influence: Minimal patent and policy citations, suggesting academic impact predominates over translational/industry impact.
- Profile Coverage: Robust across Web of Science, Google Scholar, Publons, SciSpace, and DNB.
Summary:
Carl Haasper is a highly productive and influential researcher in orthopaedics, trauma surgery, and tissue engineering. His work is widely cited, demonstrates strong academic influence, and shows significant engagement in peer-review and editorial activities. SciSpaceGoogle ScholarSpringerLink
Links